Two drinks into me, a table of colleagues burst out laughing when I lamented that the motto for VoIP should be, “taking something that isn’t broken and breaking it.†The challenge for most engineers is that they start with some neat technology and start looking for a problem to solve. Which brings me to the subject of today’s “stupid ideaâ€, TruPhone.
Instead, I’m going to focus on economics. Their pitch is that VoIP over Wi-Fi saves money. The question is, “Do you feel like you are paying too much for your wireless service?†You might always assume the answer is yes. But how much will TruPhone actually save you based upon the opportunities you have to use the service? Clearly for local or national calling, the hassle of locking on an access point and firing up the TruPhone client, simply isn’t worth it. I have a huge bucket of wireless minutes that I don’t use each month and don’t care that I don’t use them. Yeah, I should call my operator and change my plan, but see Rule #1 for why I haven’t.
It appears that TruPhone is just another effort to allow mobile phone users to call international destinations at a cheaper price. Right now TruPhone is offering free calling to a number of destinations, but this is just a come on, so take advantage if it makes sense to you. But for international calling, TruPhone rates really aren’t that great (for example, calls to India are $0.19 per minute), my www.mobilecaller.com service (I don’t work for them by the way) offers me rates of $0.12 and I don’t need a stupid Wi-Fi connection.
For all the noise about VoIP 2.0, this looks a lot like VoIP 0.9 to me. Make it different and make it better.